8 Jun 2021
1 Jun 2021
30 May 2021
An important local educational resource for the environment threatened with closure:
The Welsh Harp Environmental Education Centre has been operating in Brent for decades. It is now threatened with closure after Thames21 decided not to renew its lease in July.
Learning outside the classroom through hands-on experience is one of the best ways for children to gain a greater understanding of the natural world. The WHEEC’s unique outdoor educational programme allows children to explore and discover their role in creating a healthy environment for people and wildlife. Through interactive sessions children are provided with practical opportunities to get involved in curriculum subjects and deepen their understanding of the environment, all while developing their skills, resilience and confidence.
Programmes are run for Early Years through to Key Stage 2 in the Centre’s 2 classrooms, 5.5 hectares of woodland, 2 ponds and stream.
As David Attenborough has said, children cannot be expected to fight for the natural environment if they have not experienced it at first hand. That is the role of the Centre at a time when the climate crisis threatens children’s very future.
Bidders for Neighbourhood CIL have to show their bid is supported by the local community.To support the consortium bid for Neighbourhood CIL funding to keep the Centre open, email email@example.com giving your reasons for supporting the bid and stating your name and postcode.
acknowledgements to Brent FoE and https://wembleymatters.blogspot.com/2021/05/breaking-thames21-to-end-lease-at-welsh.html
5 May 2021
4 May 2021
Aria on the campaign trail
This Thursday 6th May, Londoners have a chance to make their voices heard. The Mayoral and London Assembly elections, postponed due to the pandemic, are now happening and have lost none of their excitement and importance.
This isn't a national election but it's still vital to get out and vote. This is a way to choose the people who will represent us and shape the future of our neighbourhoods and city. The Mayor of London's scope of work is much broader than people realise: the role determines the state of our housing, how green and safe our environment is, the quality of our communities and how efficient our transport is. They may not be debating the future of the EU or negotiating with the UN, but they have the all-important job of improving the city we live in.
The Green Party has long been fighting for the UK to improve its environmental record and combat the Climate Crisis effectively. National level action is certainly needed, but change begins locally and this election is about making a concentrated difference in your borough and city. Due to the huge role the natural environment plays in our everyday lives, we have to vote for a Party who will protect it. We all enjoy the green spaces in our local area, and we suffer when we walk to school or work along busy, polluted roads. Not only do the Greens want to make positive environmental change, they want to involve citizens too, because they recognise how important our opinions are.
The Green Party's manifesto is not just about environmental issues, but also about better housing, transport and safer streets. In fact, these are all connected: we need to have greener homes with less energy loss to save money and conserve fuel and have more efficient transport systems to help commuters on roads and bridges that are not disruptive and environmentally damaging. These things are important for all cities, but particularly London. We need an Ultra Low Emissions Zone to protect our health from rising air pollution. Where so many people are struggling to find affordable housing, we need the Greens who are committed to prevent the loss of council housing and allow people to plan for new homes through a People's Land Commission.
This election is unique - you can vote for two different mayoral candidates of your first and second preference. This will be on the PINK ballot paper, where you have to select two different names for your first and second choice. Sian Berry is the Green candidate.
In addition to voting for a Mayor, you will also vote for 2 London Assembly members, one who represents your constituency and another who is a London-wide Assembly Member. The first is on a YELLOW ballot paper and the second on an ORANGE ballot paper. For the constituency member, you select a named person but for the London-wide member, you just pick a party. Please consider voting for the Green Party.
The proportional representation system of this election is more representative than the "first-past-the-post" system of general elections, and gives smaller parties, like the Greens, a better chance of being elected, allowing London’s population to be more accurately represented. So please use your vote to support smaller and committed candidates.
During the pandemic, we have all found a new spirit of community, an appreciation for nature and our local area and have realised how much pollution improved when commuting paused for a while. Difficult times lie ahead for many people so we need a supportive Mayor who can help Londoners find houses, jobs and support services.
We've realised how much power every person holds to make positive change and shape a better, greener future. This election now gives us the chance to vote for a party who wants a new start for London, who believes in the same things as us and wants to fight to protect them.
As young Londoners who can't yet vote, we need adults to make a responsible choice for our future. We want to grow up in a safe city, free from crime and pollution with affordable houses and jobs. London really is a special city, that's why you should vote Green to give it a fresh start and make it even better for future generations.
Vote Sian Berry for Mayor, 1st choice candidate (PINK ballot)
Vote Green Party for London-wide Assembly Member (YELLOW Ballot)
Vote named Green candidate for Constituency London Assembly Member (ORANGE ballot)
By Aria Banerjee Watts (aged 16).
1 May 2021
So many reasons to vote for Emma Wallace and Sian Berry in the GLA elections & Sheila Simpson in the Brondesbury by-election
Emma Wallace moved to top of the straw poll at the Brent Friends of the Earth hustings AFTER people had heard her speak, beating Krupesh Hirani into second place despite him leading BEFORE people had heard him speak.
If you want a green London vote Sian Berry first in the Mayoral election, Vote Emma Wallace in the Brent and Harrow Constituency poll, and vote Green on the London list.
Sheila relaxing in Roundwood Park after demonstrating against US takeover of GP surgeries
And for those in Brondesbury Park who have an additional Brent Council by-election poll, please vote for our candidate Sheila Simpson. It is time for more councillors free to hold Brent Labour to account - however much it annoys them!
This is what Sheila says:
I've lived in Brent for over 25 years, working in the NHS and Local Government to support families and children’s well-being and believe well-run public services make a real difference to the quality of our lives.
I am offering voters the opportunity to register their support for green values. People want to be part of the solution, to build a fairer, healthier society, but know they can’t do it without good government. Our Council must be firmly challenged to deliver on promises made to us. Protection of our public housing, trees and green space is urgent. Traffic and public transport must be managed well to cut harmful emissions, reduce carbon footprint and provide cleaner, safer, greener and quieter neighbourhoods.
12 Apr 2021
The Green Party's Manifesto for London has now been published. Click bottom right for full size. Comments welcome.
8 Apr 2021
Emma Wallace of Harrow Green Party, and out GLA constituency candidate for Brent and Harrow, convinced many environmentalists yesterday evening at the hustings organised by Brent Friends of the Earth.
Labour's Krupesh Hirani slumped to 26% after the hustings compared with 54% before he had spoken. Emma Wallace gained 11% to take the lead and Liberal Democrat Anton Georgiou quadrapled his vote from a meagre 4% to 17%.
The Conservative candidate was invited but did not attend.
10 Mar 2021
Despite the large number of residents' objections to Quintain's revisions to its consented plans for the North East Lands section of the huge Wembley Park development, there were no questions for a resident of Marathon House after he had spoken about its impact on the daylight and skylines of residents' flats. He claimed that the application demonstrated no benefits compared with the original consent. Furthermore, he suggested that by breaking down applications into small bite size chunks developers masked the larger impact on the area.
The revisions increase the height and density of the development but move some boundary lines.
Having no questions the Committee moved on to the developer's agent who basically came out with rather a lot of what appeared to me to be greenwash. He claimed that the loss of light to residents of Marathon House was neglible and their balconies already reduced light and gave the impression of a larger loss of light than was otherwise the case.
An officer said that the benefits of the scheme was more open space, a larger capacity park (they haven't increased the size but ditched the lake and replaced with a couple of ponds), an attractive public realm with trees along Rutherford Way and making it a car free development.
Cross section of Rutherford Way
Officers argued that changes to the scheme would break up a potential 'canyon' on Rutherford Way between Marathon House (tower on right) and Unite Students on one side, and the lower Quintain development on the other. The officers' report repeated the claim that loss of light did not matter in student accommodation as it was transitory. They argued that BRE guidelines allow for special situations in urban environments and did not have to be strictly applied. They spoke about 'mirror massing' when buildings on one side of the road mirror that of the other side. The implication was that this was avoided here.
Officers echoed the agent's view that the Marathon House balconies meant more loss of light than would be the case if they were not there. They said that the Quintain blocks were set back and thus further from the middle of the road than Marathon House.
Cllr Maurice pressed on the loss of light, due to Covid more people would be working from home and there most of the time and loss of light could affect their mental health. An officer responded that the impact would be negligible on Marathon House and Unite Students.
Cllr Kennelly asked about the use of rooftop space and was told that although there was no detail yet it would be provided for amenity and bio-diversity to provide recreational and ecological benefit. The officer recognised that that the area was 'somewhat of a concrete jungle' and has been so for almost 100 years since the British Empire Exhibition and it would be nice to reintroduce the biodiversity that had been there before the BEE (watch out for cows on the roof!)
Cllr Saqib Butt said that he could not see any additional benefit compared with the oriiginally consented scheme, there were no additional housing units and he could only see loss to residents in the neighbouring blocks. Officers again pointed to trees on Rutherford Way and more space in the park due to the reduction in the size of the lake.
Cllr Kennelly said that keyworkers needed housing and often needed a car for work. Making this a car free development would exclude them. Lead officer David Glover said that there was a recent reduction in demand for parking and that people were unwilling to buy parking spaces. The development may not be suitable for such keyworkers and the Council recognised that there was a need for a range of different housing to cater for differing needs that would be open to keyworkers. Wembley Park was an ideal site for car free development being so close to Wembley Park station and other public transport with a very high PTAL rating. Kennelly expressed concern that increasingly key workers have to move out of the area and travel in to work. They needed access to centrally located housing. An officer said that Quintain recognised the need to provide some central parking for those in car free developments such as Rutherford Way.
Lead officer David Glover, discussing the impact on Marathon House residents said that there could not be a 'who comes first has the final say.' system/ Merely because their development went up first occupants could not then decide what was built opposite them - such a polcy would tie the hands of developers and planners. The revisions had an 'acceptable' impact on surrounding properties.
Donate now to help Emma Wallace fight her campaign for the London Assembly and a greener, cleaner, fairer future for us all
Brent and Harrow Green Parties have launched a Crowdfunder to help Emma Wallace, our candidate in the GLA election, in her campaign. DONATE HERE
This election is held under a fair voting system so every vote counts, which makes it one of the most important election campaigns the Greens can fight.
Greens have a great record of delivering on the London Assembly. From getting the Mayor to declare a Climate Emergency to winning £45 million worth of funding for youth clubs. Sian Berry and Caroline Russell, our two Green Party London Assembly members, get stuff done and we can get more Greens in the Assembly to do more!
We just need your support and hopefully your donations, because we are committed to using our platform in the Assembly to demand real change.
We will fight for action on the climate emergency so we can create the greenest city in the world.
We have a clear plan to keep London moving. We’ll move past polluting cars and invest in the future of travel public transport, walking and cycling.
And we will bring fresh thinking to housing, aiming to make sure no one is struggling to put a roof over their head. Every donation to this Crowdfunder is about reaching voters locally.
In Brent and Harrow we need to reach and win over as many residents as possible. Your donation will help us reach Londoners on social media, via the post and over the phone.
We can’t rely on billionaires and corporate donors like the other parties. We are a grassroots movement and your donations can help get our message through and win the support we need.
Thank you so much,
Emma Wallace, GLA Brent & Harrow Candidate
P.S. Because we're a political party
· Please note all donations will go to Harrow Green Party to help our campaign to elect Emma Wallace to the London Assembly.
· We're required to run permissibility checks on donations over £500. These will be completed as pledges are made. For the same reason, we cannot accept anonymous donations over £500.
· If you make multiple donations to us, they may be aggregated for our reporting purposes.
· Your details will appear in our election returns if valued over £500, and if you donate over £7,500 your identity will appear on the Electoral Commission website
Promoted by Martin Francis on behalf of Emma Wallace and Brent and Harrow Green Parties c/o 23 Saltcroft Close. Wembley, HA9 9JJ.
8 Mar 2021
"The most compelling and concise guide to averting climate breakdown.”
Brendan Montague, editor, The Ecologist.
Download Jonathan Neale's Fight the Fire from The Ecologist for free now.
The Ecologist has published Fight the Fire for free so that it is accessible to all.
We would like to thank our readers for donating £1,000 to cover some of the costs of publishing and promoting this book.
hard copy paperback from resistance books https://resistancebooks.org/product/fight-the-fire/
5 Mar 2021
The Green Party Trade Union group supports the protests of health workers’ Unions against the derisory 1% pay offer.
The 1% pay rise currently offered to health workers is correctly being described by Union leaders as ‘a kick in the teeth’ and ‘an insult’. These workers have worked often far beyond their contracted duties to combat the pandemic and defend the health of people throughout Britain. This has sometimes included risking and sacrificing their lives. If the government can award lucrative contracts to ministerial cronies, it can afford a decent pay award for health workers. The Green Party Trade Union group supports the protests of health workers’ Unions against the derisory 1% pay offer.
1 Mar 2021
This is the first of a series of guest posts by Emma Wallance, Brent & Harrow Green Party GLA candidate.
Harrow Council have announced that they are increasing the 2021/22 council tax by the maximum legal limit amount allowed to 4.99%. This means that the council has increased Harrow’s council tax rates by their maximum amount year on year, for the last ten years. In 2011/12 the average council tax rate in Harrow for band D (there are 8 bands, A-H) was £1186.55, in comparison to this year’s 2020/21 rate of £1522.72 for a band D property LINK . That is a £336.17 or +28.33% increase in ten years. In comparison, neighbouring boroughs Ealing and Brent current council tax rates for 2020/21 band D properties are £1239.15 and £1312.74 respectively. If we look London wide, Harrow residents are paying the third highest council tax out of the 32 London boroughs, with only Kingston and Richmond charging more. In addition, Sadiq Khan has announced an increase to the Greater London Authority (GLA) council tax precept by 1.99%, or £363.66 for an average Band D property LINK . This tax is collected by the 32 London councils on behalf of the GLA and consequently means that Harrow’s Council Tax will see a total overall increase of 5.9% next year.
This huge increase in council tax next year will come as a devastating blow to Harrow residents, many of whom are struggling with job losses and the increased pressures brought on by the Covid19 pandemic.
Withdrawal of Central Government Funding
The increase in council tax must be seen in relation to the withdrawal of central government funding to local authorities that the Conservative government have presided over for the last ten years, reducing funding support in London by £4 billion LINK . Evidence shows that a decade of imposed austerity from central government has resulted in core funding to local authorities being cut by 63% in real terms LINK . Harrow Council was already one of the lowest funded councils in both London and nationally, with funding being reduced from £52.1 million to £1.6 million in the last ten years – a reduction of 97% LINK .
This decimation in central government funding has left the current Labour administration in Harrow council in an untenable situation, having to bridge next year’s funding gap by almost £31 million LINK . This has resulted in ever increasing costs being pushed on to local residents, whilst the council provide fewer and fewer services. As Councillor Adam Swersky, responsible for finance at Harrow Council has stated, council tax has effectively become a ‘national stealth tax’ “with the Government shifting responsibility to local authorities to compensate for a lack of financial support.” LINK
Lost Local Public Services
We have seen savage cuts to our public services in Harrow over the last ten years, from housing, education, public health, as well as both environmental and community services. Street cleaning has seen repeated cutbacks, with, for example £172 000 cut from its budget in 2014, reducing the frequency of our street cleaning LINK . The Council’s waste collection services have also diminished over the last ten years, seeing in 2015 the introduction of the very unpopular £75 garden waste charge, a service that used to be included in our council tax. It has since been revealed as one of the highest garden waste charges in England LINK This lack of investment in street cleaning and waste services has continued for many years, with the now infamous 2017 footage, capturing rats swarming around bin bags in a Harrow car park LINK .
We have also seen the closure of four of our ten public libraries in 2015 (the Bob Lawrence, Hatch End, North Harrow and Rayners Lane libraries), cutting a local service that provided a lifeline to many who are isolated or in need of library services. In 2018, our two local Harrow MPs debated the issue in Parliament, with Harrow West’s Labour MP Gareth Thomas highlighting the unrelenting cuts and calling for the council to be “better funded”. Mr Thomas highlighted the rise in violent crime in the borough and how youth services had been cut by more than 75% since 2010. Conservative Bob Blackman, MP for Harrow East, responded by accusing the council of not being business friendly enough and needing to work together to apply for additional grants. LINK
The Impact of Demographic Changes and Covid
The reduction in central government funding, can also be seen in relation to a demographic change in London over the last ten years, with Harrow’s population increasing by 7.6% LINK . The increase in residents, coupled with an aging population, has resulted in ever greater pressures being placed on our local services. This can be seen most acutely on our social care services, where demand has increased across all age groups. Social care is an area which must be ring fenced by 3% in the councils’ budgets every year, with the council this year applying for an additional social care grant to help with the increased pressures on brought on by COVID-19. Indeed, the unprecedented situation caused by the pandemic has placed a huge strain on council budgets, with increased demand on an array of services LINK . Whilst the Tory government assured councils’ that they should do ‘whatever it takes’ to support residents through the pandemic, promising ‘Emergency Funding’ to councils, this has not been fully realised and the amounts have not been enough to cover all costs incurred. As a result, there is now an even bigger funding shortfall than there was before the pandemic started LINK .
Harrow Council consequently is in a situation of ongoing funding reduction from central government, changes in demographics and the resultant increased pressure on services, whilst also dealing with the impacts of Covid. This is tragically resulting in an even bigger reduction in the services provided by the council at a time when we need them more than ever.
The Green Party’s Vision for the Future
The pandemic has revealed how years of under investment have resulted in local communities being exposed and vulnerable to the health and social realities brought on by this crisis. Whilst we have seen incredible local voluntary initiatives over the last year, with people coming together to help and support each other, it is not a long term sustainable solution. Local government needs to be properly financed to ensure Harrow is a healthy and safe place for residents to live and thrive in. The Green Party have progressive plans to invest in local communities and our vital local services, believing that Council Tax needs to be radically overhauled. We would like to see council tax and business rates replaced with a Land Value Tax (LVT) or ‘developers’ duty’, which will capture the value of the land not the property. The current council tax band system is out of date and unfair, based on property prices from when the tax first emerged in 1991. It favours wealthy home owners and landlords, with costs often bypassing the owners of rented properties, passing instead to tenants. As joint leader of the Green Party, Jonathan Bartley states, “Council tax is regressive and it’s the past” LINK . The LVT will be a proportionate and locally controlled property tax – “a single tax (replacing the multiple taxes that currently exist) which will capture the real value of land, and the increased value arising from improvements to it.” LINK
Green Party Sian Berry has also just pledged to set up a People’s Land Commission if she becomes London Mayor in May, helping to restore and revive local communities. It is local communities who best understand the areas they live in, and they are the ones who should be consulted “to transform their own high streets, plan a low carbon future, and create community infrastructure and new homes.” Read more HERE.
17 Feb 2021
Guest post by Emma Wallace of Harrow Green Party and the Green Party candidate for the Brent and Harrow GLA Constituency seat
Just over a week since its launch, the petition calling on Sadiq Khan and the TFL to ‘Stop the Removal of Green Habitat’ has garnered over 500 signatures LINK .
This response shows that the wholesale destruction of habitat along our London Underground embankments is strongly opposed by many people from across London and the rest of the country. We have heard numerous similar stories to the one most recently reported on along the Metropolitan line near Pinner LINK, from Wimbledon Park on the District Line LINK , to Hackney Downs and stations along the Overground Line LINK and along the West and North of the Central and Piccadilly Lines. These reports reveal a similar lack of public consultation with local residents and the resulting distress caused by the destruction and removal of sound and visual barriers that had been provided by the lineside foliage. There has also been an absence of ecological surveys carried out by TFL before work commences, with contractors obliterating everything in their paths and showing little awareness of the biodiversity or wildlife they are displacing, including nesting birds or badger sets.
Network Rail has also been accused of devastating much of its lineside embankment greenery over recent years, carrying out a “secretive nationwide felling operation”, as reported in The Guardian 2018 LINK .
This has caused much upset with both residents and train passengers, who have repeatedly decried the raising to the ground of the once verdant banks running along the hundreds of miles of our national train network. The destruction along Lincolnshire railways in 2019 even led Tory MP, Sir John Hayes to state that the trackside vegetation removal looked like “a scene from Hiroshima” and to call for an urgent meeting with the then Environmental Secretary, Michael Gove LINK.
In response to public pressure, Network Rail published a new environmental sustainability strategy in December 2020, including a ‘Biodiversity Action Plan’ LINK . This plan contains a bold vision to improve the biodiversity of plants and wildlife lineside, committing “to the key goal of no net loss in biodiversity on our lineside estate by 2024, moving to biodiversity net gain by 2035”. This culture change within Network Rail, viewing lineside vegetation as an asset, not a liability, must urgently be adopted by TFL and the Mayor of London when managing London Underground lineside vegetation. The last London Underground Biodiversity Action Plan (LU’s BAP) was published in 2010 LINK and consequently urgently needs to be addressed and updated. TFL must use the recent Network Rail example to rethink its biodiversity management policies to meet their commitment to protecting and enhancing London’s wildlife and green spaces.
Darren Johnson, Green Party Assembly Member 2000 and 2016 and Deputy Chair of the Environment Committee, overseeing the 2012 ‘On the Right Lines?’ report LINK , has backed our campaign, commenting on the petition: “Very happy to support this. Something I worked on when I was a London Assembly Member. Of course, vegetation removal is vital for rail safety, but the scorched earth approach is not the way.” We have been overwhelmed by the support for the petition and many comments left, revealing how strongly people feel about this issue and their desire for TFL to change their policy on excessive vegetation embankment clearing and the need to replace it with a more nuanced and sustainably managed policy, which recognises and values these precious green corridors.
See below a selection of people’s comment on the petition:
· “The opportunities for ecological enhancement and support of biodiversity along rail lines are huge and cannot be overlooked! Partner with those who know, care and have the energy and resources to support projects.” Lisa Shell
· “We’re in the midst of a climate and environmental emergency and losing wildlife and biodiversity at an alarming rate. This type of habitat loss in totally unacceptable and must be stopped.” Jean Gerrard
· “Dreadful situation! I live right next to the train lines. The noise is really bad now and I can see all the passengers on the train from my kitchen window. Such a sad loss of greenery. The birds have been going crazy too. What is TFL doing about rectifying this? I'm heart broken.” Pauline D’Jemil
· “Please stop this unnecessary assault on what is left of our green spaces.” Ann Wilson
· “Green corridors whether railways, canals or rivers are vital to wildlife and mature trees reduce noise nuisance from railways and air pollution.” Martin Francis
· “You're trashing animal habitat, increasing pollution and noise nuisance. Stop it.” Anne Heritage
· “Stop making the world into a concrete jungle!” Asha Osman
· “So depressing to see. Is there any one in authority who cares about our environment?” Jean Pannell
· “Please try and think more creatively. Safety is a priority but there are surely alternatives that could be adopted. Shrubs and under planting wild grasses and low growing flowers etc.” Julie Curtis
· “This has to stop; the railways are a natural wildlife corridor and should be protected from excessive and unnecessary cutbacks.” Paula Hermes
· “Vital for so many reasons. We all know what they are. Please stop cutting down the beautiful vegetation. It’s always such a joy to see.” Sarah Holford
· “Stop destroying everything. Everywhere I look I see deforestation, destruction, the silent absence of life. Rail verges are one of nature’s last remaining lifelines. It costs nothing just to let it live. For our children and for the climate, please just stop this mindless destruction.” Anna Scrivenger
· “We need these green corridors to cut pollution, keep noise down and a respite for nature.” Linda Quin
· “These are critically important wildlife corridors.” Paul Allan-Smith
· “Why on earth?? Railway embankments are some of the few untampered wildflower habitats left - leave them alone!!” Kate Hopkins
· “I should like to see evidence of 'problem' trees and certainly do not want ANY vegetation removed in future without a previously approved assessment.” Keith Gissing
· “We are losing trees and green spaces at an ever-increasing rate. Please don’t make things even worse.” Linda McKeller
· “Trees and natural vegetation provide a vital transport corridor for animals and absorb excess rainwater.” Marc Sheimann
· “Yes, stop cutting our trees down HS2 is doing enough damage to our nature.” Erica Locke
· “We are currently seeing an unprecedented number of wildlife habitats decimated. Clearing TfL railway corridors of trees and hedges just adds to that and our climate crisis. Please consider planting more vegetation and maintaining what you have.” Elaine Persell
· “I realise that trackside trees shouldn’t be a safety’ threat, but recently the decimation of lineside vegetation has been completely over the top.” Terry Hooper
· “This is criminal. I know safety is paramount, but this is more than that. Losing pollution soaking trees, habitats, shade, aesthetic enhancement is wrong.” Polly Mortimer
· “We need every INCH of green in this supposed green and pleasant land, especially in London which would choke on its own effluent if not for the green spaces as yet untouched by speculators. In a world where homeowners are ripping up their gardens to put down gravel, we need green that produces fresh air more than ever.” John Mangan
· We desperately need more biodiversity in our cities! Please use your brains and think of what you'll be leaving for future generations.” Julie Barber
· “It's very important that Sadiq Khan shows us that he will stop the degradation of our precious environment, otherwise he'll not be voted for again!” Miranda James
· “Every tree possible is needed for reducing pollution and climate change and for wildlife habitat. Please stop cutting them down.” Lisa Penney
Thank you to everyone who has signed the petition so far. Please sign if you haven’t yet already done so. Thank you, Emma Wallace